Glossary

Conflict of Interest

A situation where a case handler's personal interests could improperly influence their handling of a report. EU Directive 2019/1937 Article 9(1)(c) requires the designated person to be impartial. Every internal channel needs an escalation route to remove the regular handler where conflict arises, such as a named alternate, an external ombudsperson, or the audit-committee chair.

Full definition

Article 9(1)(c) of EU Directive 2019/1937 requires that the person or department designated to handle reports is 'impartial and competent to discharge their duties'. Impartiality is impossible where the case handler is implicated in the alleged breach, related by employment or family to a subject of the report, or in a position where their own performance or compensation depends on the outcome. The practical implication is that every internal channel must have an escalation route to remove the regular case handler from a specific case where conflict arises. Common structures: an alternate handler (deputy compliance officer) is named in advance; an external ombudsperson is on retainer for senior-management cases; the audit-committee chair receives cases where the CEO is implicated. Failure to identify and manage a conflict of interest is one of the most cited deficiencies in regulatory inspections of internal channels and is the single most common reason an authority finds an internal channel to be non-compliant. Confidly's role model allows organisations to define escalation paths and to recuse specific staff from specific cases with an audited record of the recusal.

Related terms

Read more

Confidly puts compliance theory into practice in 15 minutes

14-day free trial. EU-hosted. No credit card. Cancel anytime.

Multi-entity? Talk to us →